TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page - - - - - - - - - i
Declaration - - - - - - - - - iii
Certification - - - - - - - - - iv
Acknowledgement - - - - - - - - v
Dedication - - - - - - - - - vi
Abstract - - - - - - - - - vii
Table of Contents - - - - - - - - viii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study - - - - - 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem - - - - - - 5
1.3 Research Questions - - - - - - - 6
1.4 Objectives of the Study - - - - - - 7
1.5 Research Hypotheses - - - - - - - 7
1.6 Significance of the Study - - - - - - 8
1.7 Scope of the Study - - - - - - - 9
1.8 Limitations of the study - - - - - - 10
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - 12
2.2 Concept of Small Scale Business - - - - - 12
2.3 The Importance of SSBs - - - - - - 13
2.4 Problems and Challenges of SSBs in Nigeria - - - 17
2.5 Concept of Business Performance - - - - - 18
2.6 Business and its Environment- - - - - - 19
2.7 Approaches to Studies on Business Performance - - - 21
2.8 Determinants of Business Performance - - - - 24
2.9 Business Performance Measurement- - - - - 26
2.10 Environmental Factors and Business Performance - - - 30
2.11 Theoretical Framework - - - - - - 38
2.12 The gap in the literature - - - - - - 42
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - 43
3.2 Research Design - - - - - - - 43
3.3 Population of the Study - - - - - - 44
3.4 Sample and Sampling Techniques - - - - - 45
3.5 Sources of Data - - - - - - - 47
3.5.1 Research Instruments for Data Collection - - - - 47
3.5.2 Validity and Reliability of Instrument - - - - 48
3.6 Methods of Data Analysis - - - - - - 49
3.6.1 Variables Definition - - - - - - - 52
3.6.2 Variables Measurement - - - - - - 53
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - 54
4.2 Data Analysis, Hypotheses Testing and Discussion of Findings - 54
4.2.1 Descriptive Analysis - - - - - - - 55
4.2.2 Analysis of the Result of Statistical Testing - - - - 57
4.3 Research Findings - - - - - - - 73
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary - - - - - - - - 74
5.2 Conclusions - - - - - - - - 76
5.3 Recommendations - - - - - - - 77
5.4 Suggestions for Further Studies - - - - - 79
References - - - - - - - - 81
Appendices - - - - - - - - 101
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Small scale businesses (SSBs) constitute large population of businesses worldwide and
they play a significant role in the economy. Consequently, the performance of small
scale enterprises sub-sector is closely associated with the performance of the nation.
SSBs play very important role towards fostering accelerated economic growth,
development and stability within several economies. They play tremendous roles in
employment generation, provision of goods and services, creating better standard of
living, as well as contributing to the growth of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the
nation, (OECD, 2000). Small firms create new jobs, open up opportunities for upward
social mobility, foster economic flexibility, and contribute to competition and economic
efficiency (Liao, Welsch, & Moutray, 2009). SSBs are the driving force for economic
growth, job creation, and poverty reduction in developing countries. They have been the
means through which accelerated economic growth and rapid industrialization have
been achieved. Furthermore SSBs has been recognized as a feeder service to large- scale
industries (Fabayo, 2009).
Studies have indicated that SSBs provide an effective means of stimulating indigenous
enterprises, enhancing greater employment opportunities per unit of capital invested and
aiding the development of local technology (Sule, 1986; and World Bank, 1995). SSBs
help in mobilizing surplus income and resources through savings for investment. In
similar vein they also encourage, as well as, promote the use of local raw materials.
Their nationwide spread contributes to a more equitable income distribution among
individuals and regions, as well as mitigating rural-urban migration. They also enhance
the strengthening of industrial linkages and the integration of industry with other sectors of the economy via production of intermediate products such as raw materials and spare
parts.
In Nigeria, for instance the recent survey of formal sector of small and medium
enterprises by National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and Small and Medium Scale
Enterprises Development Agency (SMEDAN) reveals that 92.8 per cent of the
enterprises are small scale while 7.22% are medium scale enterprises, (NBS/SMEDAN,
2012). Small scale businesses represent about 90% of the industrial sector in terms of
the number of enterprises; they also account for 70% of national industrial employment
if the threshold is set at 10 – 50 employees, and contribute 10% of manufacturing output
in Nigeria (Ajayi, 2002). Anwatu (2006) opined that 75% of the private sector in
Nigeria is dominated by small scale enterprises reiterating that Organized Private Sector
(OPS) is the engine of growth and creator of wealth and employment. The Nigeria
Chamber of Commerce, Industry, Mines and Agriculture (NACCIMA), (2006) argued
that Small businesses are the vehicle for rapid industrialization and development of any
nation. Eke (2007) argued that small businesses account for over 93 % of the total
entrepreneurs in Nigeria.
However, despite the number of SSBs and assistance given to them by government and
other agencies toward sustainable economic development, the performance of the sector
still fall below expectation in Nigeria, (Basil, 2005 & Abiodun, 2011). This may be
because the sub-sector has been bedeviled by several environmental factors militating
against its performance. Thus, this study assess the performance of SSBs in Kano and
Sokoto from 2005 to 2012, and also examine the extent to which the major
environmental factors (internal and external) impacted on the performance of SSBs in
the two states using profit, sales (revenue) and employment (number of employees) as
performance indicators.
Business performance refers to the firm‟s success in the market, which may have
different outcomes (Lebas & Euske, 2002). Therefore, strategically business
performance is often referred to as firm success or failure. Business performance is a
focal phenomenon in business studies. Therefore looking at the firm as a complex
organization seeking to survive or thrive in its competitive environment, performance
evaluation and measurement systems serve as a key contributor to the perceptual and
coordination/control capabilities of the firm. Firms evaluate their performance to help
monitor and control specific activities; to predict future internal and external states; to
monitor state and behavior relative to its goals; to make decisions within needed time
frames; and to alter the firm‟s overall orientation and/or behavior. Firm performance
measurement has been described in terms of the extent to which a firm‟s economic and
strategic objectives are achieved in the market place. Since essentially all firms
regularly set and refine strategic and economic goals for their pursuits, high
performance is the function of the degree to which the firm has achieved its goals.
Accurate business performance evaluation is a key to success for enterprises. As such
the research in the area of SSBs performance assessment is necessary for the success of
SSBs in developing countries like Nigeria.
A business organization could measure its performance using the financial and non-
financial measures. Recognizing the limitations of relying solely on either the financial
or non-financial measures, owner-managers of the modern SSBs have adopted a hybrid
approach of using both the financial and non-financial measures. The selection of
performance measures that reflect the true situation of small and medium businesses
with some degree of certainty and reliability is indeed a crucial process. The lack of
universally accepted standard performance measures left the door open to business
organizations to decide and choose their own performance measure. As such this study