DRESS CODES AND APPEARANCE NORMS AT WORK: BODY SUPPLEMENTS, BODY MODIFICATIONS AND AESTHETIC LABOUR

By

Author

Presented To

Department of Business Administration and Management

Executive Summary
This report discusses the findings of a study that examined employee perceptions and experiences of, and organisational policy and practice in, the area of dress codes and appearance management at work.

Significance of dress norms and appearance for organisations
  • Dress and appearance standards were perceived to offer the organisations in our sample a number of benefits. Broadly, the advantages included alignment of employee appearance with the organisation's brand, the professionalisation of a job role, attendance to health and safety concerns, and the creation of a sense of organisational identity.
  • As might be expected, the majority of respondents emphasised the need to project a brand-congruent physical appearance to external service recipients, largely cited as being professional or exhibiting an appropriate image. Attending to self-presentation was perceived to enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the firm's product and / or service offering.
  • The business-case for appearance management was generally based on wider assumptions surrounding what organisation-specific service recipients or society in general, might find acceptable versus unaesthetic or objectionable.
Organisational policy and practice
  • Dress codes were more explicit and comprehensive in larger organisations compared to smaller firms, and for employees in public-facing roles. However, implicit dress norms operated across the sample, with smaller firms resisting the institution of official appearance guidelines due to the more informal nature of labour practices in some of these workplaces. Public sector respondents and larger employers stated that they consulted with staff associations and / or trade unions in relation to dress and appearance policy, where relevant.
  • On the whole, although dress and appearance issues appeared quite significant in terms of representing the organisation's brand, these issues were not discussed with applicants during recruitment and selection processes. Appearance features were taken-for-granted in most cases and potential employees were expected to demonstrate their fit with the organisation by dressing according to industry or company standards and by presenting a certain look. The demonstration of one's religious identity through appearance was met with disapproval during the hiring process in one case. Opinions were at times quite strong in relation to visible tattoos and body piercings at work. Individuals with visible tattoos / piercings appeared to be stereotyped and faced stigma within particular organisational contexts, and indeed within more traditional firms. Here, an individual's perceived (un/) aesthetic qualities appeared to serve as a proxy for other personal, character-related attributes during selection.
  • Training in appearance management was not widespread, except in larger organisations where health and safety standards needed to be adhered to or where a professionalisation agenda was being pursued in the workplace (e.g. in the Emergency Services).
  • Section heads and line managers were predominantly tasked with monitoring and upholding dress and appearance norms. There were reported variations however in appearance monitoring and enforcement within and across organisations. Individual manager predilections, the centrality of health and safety regulations and the importance ascribed to brand performance appeared to dictate the approach taken in regulating employee appearance.
  • The appearance enforcement strategy in most organisations largely revolved around using humour or having an informal word with the employee who went against accepted appearance norms; however, most of the larger firms in the sample also had more formal processes where recurrent transgressions might be recorded and included in the appraisal process. While none of the respondents mentioned witnessing the use of formal procedures in their organisation, the larger firms as expected, had disciplinary processes in place which could take into account persistent dress / appearance related violations. However, the threat of disciplinary action was reportedly seen as sufficiently effective in eliciting compliance with dress codes.
Employee perceptions and experiences of appearance norms
  • Several employees in the sample used dress and appearance standards to their advantage and highlighted the many benefits offered by dress norms in their organisation / sector, including its positive effects on self-esteem. Work performance was also perceived to be enhanced particularly in interactive service roles because of the favourable impressions made on service recipients, thereby preventing client disengagement.
  • Despite a few employees recognising and even providing examples of potentially discriminatory organisational practices of hiring and promotion decisions being influenced by individual appearance features, most individuals in our sample readily accepted the dress and appearance norms within their sector. Some employees clearly defined the problems that appearance standards could create for people who 'went against the grain' including the inevitability of being judged based on dress and appearance and facing workplace discrimination.
  • Employees who reported being typecast on occasion due to their religious dress and appearance, or because of their body modifications, seemingly adjusted to the perceived prejudice by justifying such attitudes as ignorant, or by engaging in strategies to overcome biases (e.g. concealing their non-traditional identity markers or searching for employment in more inclusive workplaces).
Challenges of managing employee appearance
  • Dilemmas were raised about the effectiveness of both explicit and implicit dress and appearance norms. Selective enforcement and the presence of prejudicial attitudes could also affect employee attraction and career progression, and potentially present legal challenges for organisations.
  • A number of recommendations are made based on the study's findings, including the need for employers to recognise and address appearance-based prejudices in the workplace through initiating more transparent and structured interviewing processes and providing ongoing unconscious bias training for those involved in staff selection. It is clear that employers need to be educated further about the moral implications and the legal ramifications that could arise when specifying dress codes and employee appearance issues at work.
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Executive Summary   1
 
1  Introduction 3
 
11  Background to the study   3
 
12  Research aims   3
 
13  Research method    4
 
2  Literature review   5
 
21  Body supplements: clothing and accessories 5
 
211  Rationale for dress norms 5 

212  Dress implications for employees 8 

22  Body modifications: Tattoos, piercings and other 9
 
23  Aesthetic labour   10
 
231  Visual aesthetics and branding 11 

232  Visual aesthetics and HR implications 12 

24  Legal provisions relating to dress codes 13
 
241  The law 13 

242  Case law and dress codes 15 

2421  Sex discrimination and dress codes 15 

2422  Transgender and dress codes 16 

2423  Race, religion, or belief discrimination and dress codes 16 

2424  Human Rights Act and dress codes 17 

243  Concluding remarks 18 

3 Findings 19
 
31  Significance of dress and appearance for organisations   19
 
311  Organisational brand management 19 

312  Managing client perceptions 20 

313  Being identifiable, having legitimacy and signalling job status 22 

314  Safety perspectives  23 

315  Organisational culture and identity  24 

32   Organisational practices and employee experiences relating to dress and appearance    24
 
321  Explicit and implicit appearance policies  25 

322  Attitudes and practices relating to body supplements: Uniforms, clothing and accessories 26 

3221 Employability and selection processes 26 

3222  Dress-related training 27 

3223  Dress and brand commitment 28 

3224  Dress, work role and performance 29 

3225  Dress management outside work hours  30 

3226  Complexities: perceptions and experiences of dress norms  31 

323  Attitudes and practices relating to body modifications: Tattoos and piercings 32 

3231  Employability and selection processes  32 

3232 Concealability, the content of tattoos and job performance 34 

324  On being ‘good looking’: physical features and body shape 37 

325  Appearance monitoring and enforcement  37 

33  HR / ER challenges of managing dress codes and employee appearance  42
 
331 Recruitment & selection and career progression 42 

332 Explicit or implicit appearance norms?  43 

333 Cost and quality concerns  45 

334 Challenges in managing dress adherence 46 

335  Diversity and inclusion 47 

4  Conclusion 49
 
References  53
 
Appendix A: List of Cases    59
 


LIST OF BOXES 
21: Uniform policies and client engagement: The case of the NHS  6
 
22: Virgin’s redesigned red  uniforms  7 
 
23:  High  heels:  a  tall  order?  9 
 
24: Tattoos and employment in a non-customer facing role  10
 
25: Abercrombie and Fitch branding  11
 
31:  Look  at  competition         22 
 
32: Socialisation prior to the interview  28
 
33: Body modifications and a generational divide?  36
 
34: Dress and appearance design and 360-degree monitoring?  38
 
35: Managing and enforcing dress codes in the Emergency Services  41
 
36: Safety standards and dress code enforcement in the railways  47
 
41: General guidelines: managing dress and appearance at work  52

Learn and Obtain Diploma in Web development, Software development, Business, Technology and Creative Skills taught by industry experts. Explore a wide range of skills with our professional tutorials.

About E-Project Material Centre


E-Project Material Centre is a web service aimed at successfully assisting final year students with quality, well researched, reliable and ready made project work. Our materials are recent, complete (chapter 1 to Minimum of Chapter 5, with references) and well written.INSTANT ACCESS! INSTANT DOWNLOAD. Simply select your department, choose from our list of topics available and explore your data

Why Students Love to Use E-Project Material ?


Guaranteed Delivery Getting your project delivered on time is essential. You cannot afford to turn in your project past the deadline. That is why you must get your project online from a company that guarantees to meet your deadline. e-Project Topics Material Centre is happy to offer instant delivery of projects listed on our website. We can handle just about any deadline you send our way. Satisfaction Guaranteed We always do whatever is necessary to ensure every customer's satisfaction

Disclaimer


E-Project Topics Material Centre will only provide projects as a reference for your research. The projects ordered and produced should be used as a guide or framework for your own project. The contents of the projects should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own project. It is the aim of e-Project Topics Centre to only provide guidance by which the projects should be pursued. We are neither encouraging any form of plagiarism nor are we advocating the use of the projects produced herein for cheating.

Terms and Condition


Using our service is LEGAL and IS NOT prohibited by any university/college policies You are allowed to use the original model papers you will receive in the following ways:
  • As a source for additional understanding of the subject
  • As a source for ideas for you own research (if properly referenced)
  • For PROPER paraphrasing ( see your university definition of plagiarism and acceptable paraphrase) Direct citing ( if referenced properly)
Thank you so much for your respect to the authors copyright