COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GROWTH AND BIOCHEMICAL METABOLITES OF THREE TYPES OF INDIGENOUS CHICKENS AND THEIR CROSSES WITH HUBBARD BROILER

By

Author

Presented To

Department of Agricultural Science

A study was conducted on the comparative evaluation of growth and biochemical metabolites of three types of indigenous chickens and their crosses with Hubbard broiler. The indigenous types of chicken and their crosses with Hubbard broiler were naked neck x frizzle (NaF), normal feather x frizzle (NF), naked neck x normal feather (NaN), Hubbard broiler x naked neck/frizzle (B/NaF), Hubbard broiler x normal feather/frizzle (B/NF) and Hubbard broiler x naked neck/normal feather (B/NaN). A hundred and ten (110) birds were used as foundation stock in this study. This consisted of 90 pullets (30 from each genetic group), three cockerels each from NaF and NF, four cockerels from NaN and 10 male Hubbard broiler chickens. Ten pullets and the cockerels from each of the three genotypic groups were randomly mated, and the other 20 pullets from each of the three genotypic groups were mated artificially with pooled semen from the broilers. The resulting offspring were weighed on weekly basis, body linear measurements were also taken on weekly basis and blood samples were collected in two phases (5th and 10th week of age) with each phase consisting of 4 females and 5 male birds from each of the genetic groups. Data on growth traits and biochemical metabolites were subjected to one-way and three-ways ANOVA respectively. Biweekly body weight and growth rate differed significantly (p<0.01) among the six genetic groups. B/NaF had the highest performance for growth which range from 26.53g to 1084.13g. Similar trend was observed for growth rate except for bi-weekly growth rate at 70 days of age which did not differ significantly (p>0.05) with B/NF and B/NaN genetic groups. Bi-weekly phenotypic correlation of body weight and growth rate of indigenous chickens crossed with Hubbard broilers ranged from negative (-0.39) to positive (0.98). Similar magnitude and direction in phenotypic correlation was obtained for indigenous genetic groups without the 8 Hubbard broiler gene. The phenotypic correlation also ranged from negative to positive and high (-0.47 to 0.99). Blood biochemical metabolites (total protein, albumin, glucose and serum alkaline phosphatase) differed significantly (p<0.05) among the six genetic groups. Age and sex also had significant effects (p<0.05) on blood biochemical metabolites. NaF and NF had the highest values for biochemical metabolites except serum alkaline phosphatase which was lowest in NF (816.57 iu/l). Biochemical metabolites decreased in value as the birds increased in age except for serum alkaline phosphatase which increased with increased age. Female birds used in this study showed significantly (p<0.05) higher values of blood metabolites than their male counterparts. Correlation between blood metabolites at 5 and 10 weeks of age of indigenous chickens ranged from negative (-0.56) to positive (0.72). Same negative phenotypic correlation which ranged from low to high was also seen in indigenous chickens with broiler gene (-0.28 to 0.56). Parameters measured for proximate composition were dry matter, ash, ether, and crude protein. The results obtained indicated that there were significant (p<0.05) differences in proximate composition among the genetic groups and the values obtained are comparable to reference values in literature. It was therefore concluded that the naked neck and frizzle genes are important sources of variation in growth and biochemical metabolites as the genes were responsible for body weight, growth rate and normal biochemical values. Thus, the genes can be incorporated either singularly or in combination with Hubbard broiler in genetic improvement.

PLEASE NOTE:

That this Material is a Complete Project, Well Written and Contains 1 to 5 Chapters.


Click the download Button Below to Download the complete work. OR Call/WhatsApp Admin on: 09019904113 for Inquiry. Thank You

  • FOR ENQUIRY
  • support@e-projecttopics.com
  • 09019904113

Learn and Obtain Diploma in Web development, Software development, Business, Technology and Creative Skills taught by industry experts. Explore a wide range of skills with our professional tutorials.

About E-Project Material Centre


E-Project Material Centre is a web service aimed at successfully assisting final year students with quality, well researched, reliable and ready made project work. Our materials are recent, complete (chapter 1 to Minimum of Chapter 5, with references) and well written.INSTANT ACCESS! INSTANT DOWNLOAD. Simply select your department, choose from our list of topics available and explore your data

Why Students Love to Use E-Project Material ?


Guaranteed Delivery Getting your project delivered on time is essential. You cannot afford to turn in your project past the deadline. That is why you must get your project online from a company that guarantees to meet your deadline. e-Project Topics Material Centre is happy to offer instant delivery of projects listed on our website. We can handle just about any deadline you send our way. Satisfaction Guaranteed We always do whatever is necessary to ensure every customer's satisfaction

Disclaimer


E-Project Topics Material Centre will only provide projects as a reference for your research. The projects ordered and produced should be used as a guide or framework for your own project. The contents of the projects should be able to help you in generating new ideas and thoughts for your own project. It is the aim of e-Project Topics Centre to only provide guidance by which the projects should be pursued. We are neither encouraging any form of plagiarism nor are we advocating the use of the projects produced herein for cheating.

Terms and Condition


Using our service is LEGAL and IS NOT prohibited by any university/college policies You are allowed to use the original model papers you will receive in the following ways:
  • As a source for additional understanding of the subject
  • As a source for ideas for you own research (if properly referenced)
  • For PROPER paraphrasing ( see your university definition of plagiarism and acceptable paraphrase) Direct citing ( if referenced properly)
Thank you so much for your respect to the authors copyright