ABSTRACT
In software engineering, performance testing is testing that is performed, to determine how fast some aspect of a system performs under a particular workload. It can also serve to validate and verify other quality attributes of the system, such as scalability, reliability and resource usage. Performance testing is a subset of Performance engineering, an emerging computer science practice which strives to build performance into the design and architecture of a system, prior to the onset of actual coding effort
In recent years, Web applications have grown so quickly that they have already become crucial to the success of businesses. However, since they are built on Internet and open standard technologies, Web applications bring new challenges to researchers, such as dynamic behaviors, heterogeneous representations, novel control flow and data flow mechanisms, etc. In this paper, we propose an agent-based approach for Web application testing. While the agent-based framework greatly reduces the complexity of Web applications, a four-level dataflow test approach can be employed to perform structure testing on them. In this approach, data flow analysis is performed as function level testing, function cluster level testing, object level testing, and Web application level testing, from low abstract level to high abstract level. Each test agent in the framework takes charge of the testing in an abstract level for a particular type of Web document or object.
ORGANIZATION OF WORK
This project work is primarily designed to give an insight to Web test tool application design and measure performance
Chapter one talks about introduction to Web test tool application design and measure performance, study of problem and objectives as well as definition of the scope
Chapter two comprises the literature review Chapter three gives the detailed information about the existing (old) system, while chapter four and five deals with the design and implantation of new system
Chapter six documents the project work, while chapter seven summaries, conclusion and suggestions were made
TABLE OF CONTENT
TITLE PAGE
CERTIFICATION
APPROVAL
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT
ORGANIZATION OF WORK
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER ONE
10 INTRODUCTION
11 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
12 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
13 PURPOSE OF STUDY
14 SIGNIFICANT OF STUDY
15 SCOPE/DELIMITATIONS
16 LIMITATIONS/CONSTRAINTS
17 ASSUMPTION OF STUDY
18 DEFINITION OF TERMS
CHAPTER TWO
20 LITERATURE REVIEW
CHAPTER THREE
30 DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM
31 FACT-FINDING METHOD/ METHODOLOGY
32 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE/ORGANOGRAM
33 OBJECTIVES OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM
34 INPUT, PROCESS, AND OUTPUT ANALYSIS
341 INPUT ANALYSIS
342 PROCESS ANALYSIS
343 OUTPUT ANALYSIS
35 INFORMATION FLOW DIAGRAM
36 PROBLEMS OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM
37 JUSTIFICATION OF THE NEW SYSTEM
CHAPTER FOUR
40 DESIGN OF THE NEW SYSTEM
41 DESIGN STANDARD
42 OUTPUT SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN
43 INPUT SPECIFICATION AND DESIGN
431 FILE DESIGN
44 PROCEDURE CHART
45 SYSTEMS FLOWCHART
46 SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
461 HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS
462 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
463 OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
464 PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS
CHAPTER FIVE
50 IMPLEMENTATION
5 1 DESIGN STANDARD
52 PROGRAM DESIGN
521 PROGRAM FLOWCHART
522 PSEUDO CODE
53 CODING
54 TEST DATA/TEST RUN
55 USER TRAINING " AN OVERVIEW
56 CUTOVER PROCESS
CHAPTER SIX
60 DOCUMENTATION
61 THE USER DOCUMENTATION
62 THE PROGRAMMER DOCUMENTATION
CHAPTER SEVEN 70 RECOMMENDATIONS, SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
71 RECOMMENDATION
72 SUMMARY
73 CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
SOURCE LISTING
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER ONE
10 INTRODUCTION
In recent years, Web applications (WAs) have grown so quickly that they have already become crucial to the success of businesses However, since they are built on Internet and open standard technologies, WAs possess their own unique features, such as dynamic behaviors, heterogeneous representations, and novel data handling mechanisms These features provide concrete support to the success of WAs, but they bring new challenges to researchers and developers, especially in regard to testing WAs and ensuring their quality Testing approaches for non-WAs have to be extended to handle these features before they are used in WA testing This paper presents an agent-based approach to perform data-flow testing of WAs More precisely, the data-flow testing will be performed by autonomous test agents at the method level, object level, and object cluster level, from low abstraction level to high abstraction level In the process of the recommended data-flow testing, an agent-based WA testing system (WAT) will automatically generate and coordinate test agents to decompose the task of testing an entire WA into a set of subtasks that can be accomplished by test agents The test agents, rooted in the Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model, cooperate with each other to complete the testing of a WA An example is used to show the feasibility of the proposed approach
11 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
Kia Motors is South Korea's second largest automobile manufacturer, having sold over 16 million cars in 2009[2]
The word Kia derives from Korean words meaning "to arise to the world from Asia"
South Korea's oldest car company, Kia was founded on June 9, 1944 as a manufacturer of steel tubing and bicycle parts by hand �” and has operated as one of the country's Chaebols since In 1952, Kia changed its name from Kyungsung Precision Industry,[9] and later built motorcycles (starting in 1957), trucks (1962) and cars (1974) The company opened its first integrated automotive assembly plant in 1973, the Sohari Plant Starting in 1986, in partnership with Ford, Kia produced several Mazda derived vehicles for both domestic sales in South Korea into other countries These models include the Pride (based on the Mazda 121) and Avella, which were sold in North Americand Australasiaas the Ford Festiva and Ford Aspire
In 1992, Kia Motors America was incorporated in the United States The first Kia-branded vehicles in the United States were sold from four dealerships in Portland, Oregon in February 1994 Since then, Kia expanded methodically one region at a time Dealers in 1994 sold the Sephia, and a few years later the United States line expanded with the addition of the Sportage
However, Kia's bankruptcy in 1997, part of the Asian financial crisis, resulted in 51% of the company being acquired in 1998 by South Korean rival Hyundai Motor Company, outbidding Ford Motor Company which had owned an interest in Kia Motors since 1986[10] Subsequently, however, Hyundai has divested some of its ownership of Kia Motors,[11] and currently Hyundai Motor Company owns less than 40% of the company
In October 2006, Kia Motors America broke ground for Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia in West Point, Georgia, representing a $1 billion USD investment for the company[12] Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia opened in February, 2010 For 2009, KMA recorded its 15th consecutive year of increased US market share
12 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Owing to:
62 Pages 11,875 Words 1,718 Views Microsoft Word Format No. of Chapters: 1 to 5 Chapters