Site Logo E-PROJECTTOPICS

DUTIES AND POSITION OF COMPANY DIRECTORS UNDER NIGERIAN COMPANY LAW


Presented To


Law Department

📄 Pages: 65       🧠 Words: 8517       📚 Chapters: 5 🗂️️ For: PROJECT

👁️‍🗨️️️ Views: 156      

⬇️ Download (Complete Report) Now!

DUTIES AND POSITION OF COMPANY DIRECTORS UNDER NIGERIAN COMPANY LAW

INTRODUCTION

The enormous and challenging responsibilities of managing incorporated companies are vested on directors by the Companies and Allied Matters Laws of the Federation, 2004.

Consequently I am attracted into researching about these human agents, trustees and organs of the company whose acts within the purview of the Law could be said to be the acts of the company. Though "ownership" normally are vested on shareholders (it is not the objective of this project to discuss extensively on shareholding) for they bear the ultimate risk in the event of any mishap to the company. It is an established fact that directors stand in a fiduciary relationship to the company and also owe duty of care and skill.

Generally directors owe certain obligations to the companies in the performance of their functions. It must be noted that the Act also provides for circumstances upon which a director could be removed. The responsibility of enforcing the duties of directors lies with the company, technically speaking therefore, it is the responsibility of the directors to enforce this duties. It is pertinent to note that the rule in Foss V Harbottle has been whittled down by certain exceptions, which are also statutorily provided. This project also highlights the liability of directors and when a shareholder could institute derivative action for and on behalf of the company.

1.1   WHO IS A DIRECTOR?

A director is a person duly appointed by the company to direct and manage the business of the company.1 This definition goes a step further than the 1968 Act2 by adding due appointment as a condition precedent. Section 244 (2) provides a rebuttable presumption that all persons described by a company as directors, whether as executive or otherwise, have been duly appointed. This safeguards third parties dealing with the company. In Aberdeen Railway Co. V. Blaikie Bros3, Lord. Cransworth defined directors to be somebody to whom is delegated the duty of managing the general affairs of

    1.    Sec 244(1) of the Companies and Allied Matters Act CAP C20 LFN 2004- the term "director" of a company would be defined "as a person appointed or elected according to Law, authorized to manage or direct the affairs of a company or Corporation" Sofowara, Mordern Nigerian Company Law", second edition, 2006, p.425

2.    Formally Companies Decree No. 51 of 1968 at p

3.    (1859) 3 & 4 Macq 461 at p. 471

the company. Section 245 (1) of the Act4 defines a shadow director as "any person on whose instructions and directions the directors are accustomed to act". A shadow director is also deemed to be a director. Although this definition is not explicit, it is deemed to take care of the practice where recognized groups or corporations nominate directors on another company's board to represent and protect their interests. This is usual with some banking institutions, which lend huge amounts of money to companies. Another good example of shadow director is where a government nominates some directors to represent its interest in a company where the government has substantial or controlling shares, for instance, the Nkalagu Cement Company Ltd has in its board some directors nominated by the government of Enugu, Anambra, Imo and Abia States. These four state governments could be described as shadow directors in relation to the Nkalagu Cement Company Ltd, because their nominee 'directors' are

    4. Decree No.1 of 1990 later designated as "Act"

accustomed to act on their instructions. It should be noted that the above mentioned situation is a deviation and an exception to the rule that directors must only be appointed by shareholders at a general meeting of the company as provided by Section 248 of the Company and Allied Matters Act, CAP C20 LFN 2004.

However, it is pertinent to mention that persons who give advice to directors in their professional capacities are not included in the concept of shadow directors.

📄 Pages: 65       🧠 Words: 8517       📚 Chapters: 5 🗂️️ For: PROJECT

👁️‍🗨️️️ Views: 156      

⬇️ Download (Complete Report) Now!

🔗 Related Topics

AN APPRAISAL OF THE LAW AND PRACTICE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE NIGERIAN BANKING SECTOR AN APPRAISAL OF THE LIABILITIES OF A COMPANY FOR THE ACTS OF ITS DIRECTORS AN APPRAISAL OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE) RULES 2009 IN NIGERIA AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF MINORITY PROTECTION UNDER NIGERIAN COMPANY LAW AN APPRAISAL OF ADMINISTRATION OF ESTATE OF DECEASED MILITARY PERSONNEL UNDER THE NIGERIAN MILITARY LAW WILL A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS UNDER COMMON AND ISLAMIC LAWS CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RIGHT OF ARTIFICIALLY INSEMINATED CHILD TO INHERIT UNDER ISLAMIC LAW THE ROLE OF LAW IN PROMOTING GENERAL SAFETY ON FLIGHT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW AN APPRAISAL OF MILITARY RULE AND THE NIGERIAN CONSTITUTION A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF INSURABLE INTEREST UNDER THE NIGERIA LAW OF INSURANCE THE CONCEPT OF STATE RECOGNITION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW AN APPRAISAL OF EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION: NIGERIAN EMPLOYEES’ COMPENSATION ACT, 2010 IN PERSPECTIVE AN EXAMINATION OF EMERGING LEGAL CHALLENGES IN NIGERIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW AN EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF NIGERIAN COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (NCC) IN REGULATING THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR A CRITIQUE OF THE SEPARATION OF OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF COMPANIES UNDER COMPANIES AND ALLIED MATTERS ACT 2004 AN APPRAISAL OF INCOME TAX ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES UNDER THE NIGERIAN TAX SYSTEM A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MEANS OF PROOF IN CIVIL LITIGATION UNDER ISLAMIC LAW ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN NIGERIAN COURTS: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS A Critical Overview Of The Consent Provisions Under The Land Use Act, 1978 ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTCIE IN NIGERIAN COURTS, PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS

click on whatsapp