Ogechukwu (2006) opines that the changing dynamics in the economy has also prompted scholars
and practitioners to reclassify SMEs into micro and super-micro businesses, with a view to
providing adequate incentives and protection for the former In that context, any business or
enterprise below the upper limit of N250, 000 and whose annual turnover exceeds that of a
cottage industry currently put at N50, 000 per annum is a small scale industry
Furthermore, the National Directorate of Employment (NDE) concept of a small scale industry
has been fixed to a maximum of N35, 000 In other words, a business unit of not less than N35,
000 is characterized as a small scale business in Nigeria
The definition of small-scale enterprises (SSEs) in Nigeria has changed over the years not only in
consonance with the changing fortune of the country but also in accordance with the diversity of
the Small and Medium Enterprises Prior to 1992, different institutions in Nigeria adopted varying
definitions of small enterprises The institutions include the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN),
Nigerian Bank for Commerce and Industry (NBCI), Centre for Industrial Research and
Development (CIRD), Nigerian Association of Small-Scale Industrialists (NASSI), Federal
Ministry of Industry (FMI) and the National Economic Reconstruction Fund (NERFUND)
However, in 1992, the issue of conflicting definition was resolved with the establishment of
National Council on Industry, which is now policy making organ for the sector in Nigeria Among
the conceptual issue that was resolved is whether Small-Scale Industry definition should include
all economic activities such as trading, buying and selling or whether it should be restricted to
productive industrial activities especially manufacturing Accordingly, a clear distinction was
made between small-scale enterprises consisting of trading, buying and selling activities and
small-scale industries engaged in manufacturing industry
This definition of SMEs may not be the same in other countries, but may be useful in developing
countries, because of the low capacity of these countries small scale industry
One of the factors militating against the development of SMEs in Nigeria is lack of funding This
is so because, SMEs in Nigeria depends on owners equity (personal savings), borrowings from
friends and relations, borrowing from government agencies (example; Small and Medium Scale
Equity Investment scheme), and borrowing from commercial banks Of all these funding sources, extensive studies have shown that the most reliable and effective source is the commercial bank
loan to SMEs The studies further argue that those small banks are more effective in financing
this sector and attribute this to relationship bonding The studies further argue that the size of a
bank influences the volume of funding to SMEs SMEs in Nigeria cannot access the capital
market because of the stringent listing requirement for the first and second tier markets However,
it is speculated that the recent banking reforms, through consolidation, might have affected the
effectiveness of banks in discharging this function
There are a number of potential benefits derivable from the lifting of geographic barriers to
competition in banking and the associated wave of consolidation These include, but are not
limited to, diversification, improved competition, and the elimination of entrenched inefficient or
self serving bank managers What is less clear is the effect of consolidation on the supply of credit
to businesses, particularly small businesses that depend on banks for external credit
A survey of small credit to small firms (Cole, Wolken, and Woodburn 1996), has established a
fairly strong link between size of banks and the supply of small business credit, with bigger banks
devoting less proportions of their assets to small business lending than smaller banks (Berger,
Kashyap, and Scalise 1995, Keeton 1995, Levonian and Soller 1995, Berger and Udell 1996, Peek
and Rosengren 1996, Strahan and Weston 1996) Small banks are considered primary sources of
credit for small businesses Unlike highly capitalized and publicly traded firms, which have
access to capital markets, small businesses rely strongly on banks for small business credit, partly
because of the challenges of accessing fund from the capital market These Small and Medium
Scale businesses often concentrate their borrowing at financial institutions, mostly small banks
with which they have long-term relationships, ie relationships that prove mutually beneficial to
both parties This relationship enables banks to collect information about the SME's ability to
repay such facility, thereby reducing the cost of providing credit facilities Small and Medium
Scale Enterprise in turn, enjoy better access to credit facilities and lower cost of borrowing
Small banks make more of these "mutual relationship loans" than do large banks, which are more
likely to make generic loans based on calculated financial ratios from the operating result of the
borrower and credit indices The banking industry which is considered as a major provider of fund to small and medium
enterprises has passed through several stages of regulatory frameworks to its present state and this
development could be categorized into five stages Okafor (2011) presented five clusters of
reform as (i) First (Independence) reforms cluster 1960 to 1996, The objective of this reform was
to establish indigenous Banking institutions that will pilot the economy of the newly independent
Nigeria (ii) Second (indigenization) reform cluster 1970 to 1976 (iii) Third (Okigbo Committee)
reform cluster 1977 to 1985, (iv) Fourth (Structural Adjustment Programme) reform Cluster 1986
to 1990 (v) Fifth (Fourth Republic) reform cluster 2000-2010 Okafor (2011) further states that
each of the clusters represents some major and minor reforms that are directed at improving
banking service delivery in Nigeria
Nnanna (2006) states that the first stage from 1930 to 1959, was characterized by poorly
capitalized and unsupervised indigenous banks, leading to failure at their infancy He states that
the second stage was from 1960 to 1985 In this period, the Central Bank of Nigeria regulatory
policy framework was designed to ensure that only persons with good character and financial
strength were granted Banking License subject to prescribed minimum paid up capital
The development of this stage was based on the introduction of minimum paid up capital and
other requirements before the grant of banking licenses to operators He states also that the third
stage from 1986 to 2004 involved the post Structural Adjustment Programmes (SAPs) or the De-
control Regime during which the neo-liberal philosophy of free entry was over stretched and
Banking licenses were dispensed by the political authority on the basis of patronage A major
reform in the banking sector during the period was universal banking policy This policy was
responsible for the consolidation of merchant banks, commercial banks and exchange house into a
universal bank Therefore, one bank was required to perform all banking functions He states
further that the fourth stage of banking sector reform could be described as the era of
consolidation ie 2004 to 2008
The major emphasis of that period was on recapitalization and proactive regulation based on risk
focused supervision framework The fifth stage; he describes as the post consolidation era, where
the focus is to strengthen the banking sector through efficiency-driven policies The fourth stage, which was the consolidation era elicited interest both from the academic circle as well as from
operators in the Nigerian Banking industry more than the other eras (Nnanna 2006)
This frequent policy changes which the CBN introduces as a regulatory institution may have
affected the banking landscape in Nigeria, as a result, there have been several attempts both
within and outside Nigeria to examine the impact of these consolidation programmes on bank
performance In Nigeria and other economies, researchers have viewed banking sector
consolidation differently
Adeyemi (2006) examines the issues and challenges arising from the banking sector reform
programme in Nigeria He noted that since the consolidation programme was policy induced, the
18 months given for total compliance appeared inadequate, following the number of activities
required for consolidation to be successfully consummated, he however acknowledged that the
programme could lead to the emergence of a sound and efficient financial system that would
support the growth and development needs and aspirations of the Nigerian economy, to fully
harness the synergies and potentials of the consolidation programme He therefore, advocated for
proper handling of post consolidation challenges such as continuous flow of fund to small and
medium enterprises
Oladepo (2010) posits that the value gains that alleged to accrue to the large and growing wave of
consolidation activity have not been verified Thus leading the research community in quandary
on whether the industry has followed a path of massive restructuring or a misguided belief of
value gains of consolidation He stated that it is not clear whether the financial regulators and
operators are insincere to the public and shareholders about the effects of their activity on
shareholders' value and banking performance It is important to address this issue by reconciling
data with empirical reality of continued consolidation activity
Soludo (2004) states that one of the focus of the banking sector consolidation was to develop a
diversified, strong and reliable banking sector capable of playing active developmental roles in
the local economy including funding of SMEs and of being competent and competitive players in the African regional and global financial system It is argued that small banks are primary source
of credit for small and medium enterprises This is because these enterprises do not have access to
capital market where large funds can be sourced Their inability to access fund from the capital
market could make them to concentrate their borrowing from institutions with which they have
long term relationship ie relationship that prove mutually beneficial It is generally argued that
this relationship enables banks to collect information about the borrower's ability to repay, and
this could reduce the cost of providing credit
The need to empirically investigate the impact of bank consolidation on the performance of SMEs
in Nigeria motivates this study, since empirical studies on this issue, based on the researcher's
knowledge are inadequate
12 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Graig and Hardee (2006) posit that small and medium enterprises are the major sources of job
growth in any country It is generally argued that small and medium enterprises are characterized
by three principal features namely (i) relatively small principal (ii) absence of asset-based
collateral and (iii) simplicity of operations
The bulk of small and medium enterprise credit is said to come primarily from banks therefore
institutional changes through consolidation could have an adverse effect on small business credits
and the performance of SMEs (Gray abd Harde, 2006) This really has to be ascertained in the
Nigerian situation, hence the challenge or problem of this study For instance, government in past
have tried through several intervention schemes to promote funding to SMEs The schemes which
were designed to ensure continuous flow of fund to SMEs include; the Nigerian Agricultural and
Co-operative Bank Ltd (NACB), the National Directorate of Employment (NDE), the Nigerian
Agricultural Insurance Corporation (NAIC), the Peoples Bank of Nigeria (PBN), the Community
Banks (CBs), the Family Economic Advancement programme (FEAP)
Despite these schemes, SMEs largely rely on commercial bank for fund However, the 2004/2005
bank consolidation is argued to have constrained the smooth flow of fund from commercial banks to SMEs in Nigeria Some studies have argued that consolidation of the banking industry will
have negative impact on the amount of credit available to small businesses Strahan and Weston
(1996) state that small banks are said to be major source of credits for small business outfit,
unlike large firms which have access to the capital market, small and medium enterprises rely
heavily on bank credit If small banks are increasingly acquired by large banks in the form of
consolidation, it may be strongly contended that it will have a negative effect on the availability
of credit to small and medium enterprises
Graig and Hardee (2004) examine the implication of consolidation on the amount of credit
available to small business They found that access to credit consolidation significantly reduced
banking credit to SMEs They argue that this can reduce the productivity of small businesses and
their overall contribution to the economy in terms of increasing employment creation and social
welfare The implication of lack of credit to small business is that these small businesses may be
increasingly turning to non-bank sources of finance to access credit However this source comes
with a cost to this class of business hence increasing the cost of production
However, these studies failed to investigate the impact of bank consolidation on the performance
of SMEs in Nigeria This is especially necessary, given that bank consolidation was aimed at
ensuring bank stability, promoting good corporate governance, establish mega banks and promote
bank lending to the private sector
13 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
The main objective of this study is to assess impact the 2004/2005 bank consolidation on the
performance of SMEs in Nigeria Specific objectives of the study include:
(i) To determine the effect of pre and post bank consolidation on the number of registered
small and medium enterprises in Nigeria
(ii) To examine the impact of pre and post bank consolidation on the growth of small and
medium enterprises
(iii) To assess the contribution of pre and post bank consolidation Nigeria on lending to small
and medium enterprises in Nigeria