ASSESSMENT OF OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENDITURE ON HEALTHCARE AMONG HOUSEHOLDS IN KEFFI

By

Author

Presented To

Department of Medicine

ABSTRACT
One of the main challenges of accessing health care in Nigeria is payment for service at the point of delivery. Out-of-pocket (OOP) payments being the main method of financing health care, has posed a serious constraint in accessing health care. This study assessed the socio-economic status of households in relation to out-of-pocket payment and how these have influenced households? access to health care in Keffi, Nasarawa state, North Central Nigeria. It also provided the necessary information on the options available for health care prepayment other than OOPs. Method: A cross-sectional household based descriptive study design was used to study out-of-pocket expenditure on health care by households in the settlement. A structured closed-ended interviewer administered questionnaires was administered on eligible 316 household heads or appointed persons selected from listed wards using multistage random sampling technique. Wealth index was developed to assess the socio-economic status of household heads and the equity of OOPs by the use of Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Pearson Chi-square test was used to determine the relationship between OOPs and other categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to examine the multivariate relationship of OPPs. Results: Of the 316 households 171 sought for treatment within the three months covered by this study. About 66% of households were in the lowest and second quintiles (combined) and only 3.8% is of the highest quintile. Households utilized health care services from traditional healers, patent medicine stores, clinics and hospitals. The educated used the formal health care services more than those with none formal education, however the association was not statistically significant. . Those with lower income accessed clinics and hospitals (63.0%) than the wealthiest (35.0%) who utilized more of patent medicine vendor service but; the difference was also not statistically significant. Ninety eight percent (98.2%) paid directly for health care service while only 1.8% paid for the same service through health insurance, especially, National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS). The proportion of income spent on health care was 6.22%. The poor spent five times disproportionately higher than the better off and their spending was more catastrophic than the higher income groups. Conclusion: the main constraint to accessing health care was OOPs which is as a result of none availability of social health insurance or any other form of health care insurance. There is therefore the urgent need to expand the National Health Insurance scheme and introduce the Community Based Social Health Insurance Programme so as to reach those in the non-formal sector.