ABSTRACT
A company has over time proven to be a very viable form of business, the company has grown tremendously in size and number of shareholders base making it necessary that a few people be selected to manage the company on behalf of the investors since all of them Laws are put in place to put a check on these managers to prevent corporate abuse and ensure that the company is managed with due care and skill to the benefit of the investors. This research has shown that the government lacks the will and determination for the prompt implementation of its laws despite all the efforts made in providing the law, there are also some loopholes can through which fraudulent and dishonest persons can take advantage of for their own personal gains thereby defeating the very essence of the laws which are investors protection. An examination of some of the laws provided to protect investors in Nigeria shows their inadequacies and the fact that it has become a mere academic exercise, ink on paper and is quite different from what is obtainable in practice. Doctrinal method of research was used in this research referring to statutory laws, textbooks, journals, newspapers and internet materials. The findings were that; there is the lack of will by the regulatory bodies to implement the law, company meetings have been provided as an important tool for investors’ protection in Nigeria but that has been circumvented through late delivery of the notice of meetings or inefficiency of the postal system, the Companies and Allied Matters Act did not provide for qualifications for people to be appointed as members of the audit committee and the inspectors to investigate the affairs of a company and also in a bid for the provision of Section 63 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act to provide for division of powers among the board of directors and the shareholders it ended up bringing in terms as’ good faith’ and ‘due diligence’ which are subjective terms. It is therefore recommended that; The regulatory bodies should ensure prompt implementation of its laws and policies; it should be mandatory that companies should use the message alerts and emails in addition to the traditional form of notice to inform share holders of any company meeting; The Companies and Allied Matters Act should provide for people to be appointed as members of the audit committee should be people with knowledge in accounting, company law and vast experience and section
63(4)of the Companies and Allied Matters Act should be Expunged. In conclusion it can be said that investors’ protection does not lie on the Government alone but on all stakeholders, it lies on the investors sought to be protected to be vigilant, exercise all their rights provided by law and for the regulatory bodies to live up to their role and enforce the provisions of the law when there is any violation.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title page i
Declaration ii
Certification iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgement v
Abstract vi
Table of content vii
Table of cases viii
Table of statute - ix
CHAPTER ONE
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
11 Background to the study 1
12 Statement of the problem - 5
13 Aims and objectives of the study 5
14 Justification 5
15 Scope of the study 6
16 Research methodology - 6
17 Literature review 6
18 Organisational layout 9
CHAPTER TWO
THE EVOLUTION OF CORPORATE FORM OF INVESTMENT 10
21 Introduction - 10
22 The Evolution of Company - 11
221 The Joint Stock System 13
222 The Beginning of Public Dealings 14
2 23 The Companies Act of 1844 18
224 The Introduction of Limited Liability - 19
225 The Consolidation of Company law -
20
23 The Evolution of Company in Nigeria 23
24 The Capital Market 27
25 The Stock Exchange 29
CHAPTER THREE
THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR INVESTORS’ PROTECTION IN NIGERIA - 35
31 Introduction - 35
32 The Companies and Allied Matters Act 1990 (CAMA) 36
321 Division of corporate powers 37
322 Investigation of companies affairs - - 38
323 Disclosure 45
324 Company accounts - 48
325 Financial statement - 51
33 The Investment and Securities Act 2007 66
331 Disclosure under the Investment and Securities Act 2007 67
332 Public issue and the disclosure system , 70
333 Investigation under the Investment and Securities Act ,, 74
334 Investors protection fund ,, 75
34 Nigerian Investment Promotion Commission Act 1995 77
341 Investment Protection Assurances 78
35 The Trustees Investment Act 1990 - 79
CHAPTER FOUR
CHALLENGES TO INVESTORS’ PROTECTION IN NIGERIA 82
41 Introduction 82
42 Lack of effective corporate governance - 83
43 Corporate powers - 85
44 The poor performance of auditors and the audit committees - 88
45 The directors control of general meetings and shareholders apathy 93
46 Directors control of proxy instrument - 96
47 High illiteracy rate in Nigeria 97
48 The postal system in Nigeria 100
49 Corruption in Nigeria 101
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, FINDINGS AND RECCOMMENDATIONS 105
51 Summary 105
52 Conclusion - 108
53 Findings - 110
54 Recommendations - 111
BIBLIOGRAPHY